|  Letters to the Editor
 Yes, I can verify that “World War II POW Jake DeShazer chose a life
            of love not hate” (Spring 2004 Response). As his daughter, I’ve had
            a front- row seat to watch my dad and to observe the rock-solid commitment
            to the Lord he made in the Japanese prison, his commitment to his
            marriage to mom and his commitment to bring others to the Lord. I
            feel very blessed and honored to have such a genuine, loving, honest
            and supportive father to model my life after.
  It has been almost
              60 years since dad was released from prison and his surprising
              announcement of God’s call on his life to return to Japan as a
              missionary. It’s
              also been almost 30 years since his retirement from a lifetime
              of missionary activity in Japan. Yet dad’s story is still relevant
              today; people remind me time after time of how his story continues
              to be shared amongst friends, pastors, military people, schools
              and churches all over the world. Yes, all because he chose love!
             Thank you, Clint Kelly, for depicting dad as he is. Thank you,
                President Watson and the SPU family, for giving my dad such a
                warm welcome on your campus. Thank you also, SPU, for equipping
                and preparing him for the great mission that lay ahead. You encouraged
                and supported him on his journey of trusting God for everything
                in life.— Carol Aiko DeShazer Dixon ’79,
              Chicago, Ill.
  I WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED with your glorification-of-war
              issue of Response (Spring 2004). While the editor reminded us “seldom
              has there been a greater demonstration of the principles of Christianity
              to peace 
,” the photos you chose were all about war. Anyone who
              has talked to Jake DeShazer knows that the bombing raid lasted
              a few hours, and his ministry was what he put his whole life and
              soul into. Pictures speak louder than words. Your full-page cover
              is a picture of a bomber like the one he spent a few hours in.
              Your huge, two-page opening spread is another bomber. Your last
              full picture is Jake showing off his medals. What are you saying
              really? I wish the emphasis of the pictures could have been on
              his ministry, which was so powerful, rather than the hardware and
            medals of war.             
             It was the gospel of forgiveness from a man who
              had every earthly right to be bitter that opened the Japanese hearts
              to the gospel of Jesus. 
 While
              Jake DeShazer might have embodied the Sermon on the Mount and the
              Golden Rule, this issue glorified the opposite for me. You can
            do much better. Please do. — Michael Bade ’77, Seattle, Wash.
  Inspired
            by Brooks and DeShazer             
             WHAT AN EVENING OF inspiration I had tonight
              reading the current issue of Response! In particular, the articles
              relative to David Brooks were superb. What a good thing it was
              to have him on the SPU campus and in Seattle. 
 And the Jake DeShazer
              story  including the informational editor’s note  were outstanding.
             Strangely, as I read the “Footnotes” section, which I always do,
              it struck me what an advertisement those quips are for the best
              in Christian higher education. SPU has a host of alumni who,
              everyday in places all around the world, demonstrate the qualities
              David Brooks is looking for in upcoming leaders. The SPU alumni
              have been doing this for a long time.— John F. Sills, Cascade
              College ’62, Portland,
            Ore.
  “It’s Like Mount Rainier Is Gone”              
                WHAT A WARM FEELING came
              over me as I opened the cover of the Spring 2004 Response and
              realized SPU had not forgotten my dad: President C. Hoyt Watson!
              He held sway during those war years, when my world fell apart
              as I received word of my husband’s death in France. The Allan
              Fisher ’40 Memorial
              Chapel was created on campus in honor of the SPU veterans who gave
            their lives for their country.
              When the news broke that POW Jake
              DeShazer was released from prison, my dad invited him to enroll
              at Seattle Pacific. I remember well greeting Jake as he appeared
            in the library his first day on campus. 
 
             The week following
              my dad’s death, I was at Safeway on Queen Anne Hill in Seattle,
              looking down into the frozen foods section, when suddenly [the
              late Seattle Pacific Professor of Economics] Mendel (M.B.) Miller’s
              head appeared next to mine. He quietly said, “It’s like Mount Rainier
              is gone.”— Lola
            Watson Fisher Pettengill ’37, Seattle, Wash.
 Toshiko’s Story Is
            My Story 
              I READ WITH INTEREST the recent Response article
              about Toshiko Senda. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December
              7, 1941, the lives of the Japanese in America  citizens and aliens
              alike  changed
              overnight. We came to be viewed as potential enemies of the American
            war effort. 
 
             My family received official orders to leave our
              home on Bainbridge Island in six days. Armed soldiers came to pick
              us up on March 30, 1942. Our destination was Manzanar Reception
              Center in the dry, hot desert in Owens Valley at the foot of
              the High Sierras. This camp was in the process of being built
              and provided only the basic necessities of living. Measuring 1
              square mile, it was enclosed with barbed-wire fence and had watchtowers
            manned by armed guards. 
             Eventually, essential services were provided:
              post office, general store, schools, hospital, city council, recreation
              programs, beauty shop, barber shop, etc. Protestant, Catholic and
              Buddhist churches served the spiritual needs of the evacuees. My
              parents were Buddhists, but my close friends started to attend
              Sunday school at the Protestant church, so I tagged along. Soon
              I became a believer and enjoyed the fellowship with Christians.
            A good thing came out of difficult circumstances.
              
 The day after
              V-J Day, we left camp, free at last, to return home. Our strawberry
              farm was overrun by tall weeds, and my parents had to start all
              over again. I was able to complete my junior and senior years of
              high school with my classmates. The principal, Clifford Axelson, 
                                                                                    an SPC alumnus, introduced me to Seattle Pacific. I enrolled
              in September 1947 and completed the nursing program in 1952. — Yaeko
              Yoshihara ’52,
            Bellevue, Wash.
  I WAS INTERESTED in 
                                                                        Sarah Jio’s story: “Dear Toshiko.” The story evoked my own memories 
                                                                        of the Japanese-American citizens’ incarceration during World War II. 
                                                                        For 30 years, my father was pastor of
              the Japanese Baptist Church in Seattle. I was 5 years old in 1942
              when our church was vacated and locked. Our people had been sent
              to Minidoka, an internment camp near Twin Falls, Idaho. We followed
            them and rented a house nearby.            
              I have vivid memories of the indignities
              we endured while continuing ministry in the camp. 
 If a picture
              of the camp were juxtaposed to a picture of the Nazi concentration
              camps in Europe, one would be hard-pressed to tell the difference
            between the two.             
             Toshiko’s story is part of my story. Thank you
              for printing her story so we would not forget the injustice and
              prejudice suffered by American citizens during World War II. — E.
              Brooks Andrews ’62,
            Stanwood, Wash.
 Editor’s Note: Response readers helped us solve
              the mystery of whether Toshiko Senda was able to attend her 1942
            Commencement ( for the story).            
              Rick Steves and the War            
              I SO ENJOYED
              THE ARTICLE on Rick Steves. It made me hanker for a European vacation.
              I loved his emphasis on the people and not the monuments. That’s
              the way I’d
            love to travel.             
             Thanks also for being forthright about Steves’ position
              on the war. This is such a polarizing issue, and I’m refreshed
              to see SPU being open to the many varying Christian responses to
              it. I am a longtime pacifist, by the Quaker influence of my mother,
              who sent me to SPU. After spending so many years around Republican
              Evangelicals (beloved Republican Evangelicals!), 
 it is refreshing
              to see, as an SPU alum, that liberals are also welcome in the
            fold.             
             Thank you for an intelligent and inspiring publication.— Katherine
            Grace Hotchkin Bond ’86, Duvall, Wash.
 The Da Vinci Code and Women
            in the Church             
             THANK YOU FOR YOUR review on The
                Da Vinci Code.
              Professor Vogt answers a number of questions that naturally arise
              when one reads this page-turner, but he seems to have missed one
            aspect that really needs to be mentioned.            
              Regardless of what one
              believes about the historical accuracy of the book, it does raise
              questions about how women are viewed in church today. It seems
              hypocritical to me for the church, which has been one of the leading
              champions of women’s
              issues worldwide, to say that women should not be denied any opportunity
              based solely on gender, and then to turn right around and say that
              women cannot occupy certain leadership roles within the church
            itself based completely on gender.             
             The Da Vinci Code requires
              Christians to re-examine our stance on the role of women in our
              churches. I have never been convinced of the traditional interpretation
              of Scripture on this subject, but I am convinced that if we do
              not re-examine this issue, we will continue to be seen as irrelevant
              and outdated. 
— John Matas ’84, Manitou Springs, Colo.
 Graceful
            Commentary on “The Passion”            
              DR. [ROB] WALL STATED (in the Spring 2004 Response) 
                                                                                    that believers must “voice graceful commentary” to
              correct impressions made by Mel Gibson’s film “The Passion of
              The Christ.” Allow me
            to attempt graceful commentary in response to Dr. Wall’s comments.            
              If Gibson’s film is not an attempt to provide a literalistic take
              on the gospel of Christ, then what is it? It certainly isn’t “Godspell,” “Jesus
              Christ Superstar” or “Last Temptation of Christ”  each of the
              aforementioned, it can be argued, are “artful commentaries” or “exposi-
              tions on biblical texts.” Certainly, Mel Gibson has taken artistic
              license in some areas. But many Christians, Protestant and Catholic
              alike, have viewed this film and have been able to separate that
            license from the gospel narrative. 
             Second, Dr. Wall believes that
              the film is anti-Jewish. But if the film is anti-Jewish, then
              one must assume that the four gospels are anti-Jewish as well.
              Even if the conflict between Jesus and the Jewish establishment
              of the day was given greater context, I don’t see how a faithful
              interpretation of Christ’s life avoids the fact that the Jewish
              leaders ultimately rejected the Messiah, and arranged to have him
            executed as a common criminal for political reasons.
              Finally,
                contrary to Dr. Wall, I think one reason this film is so powerful
                is that the viewer is given an insight into the suffering of
              our Lord. If all I know is that a debt was paid for me, then I
              might have a muted sense of gratitude to the one who paid it. But
              if I realize that my debt was infinitely beyond my ability to pay
                it, then my sense of gratitude becomes much more profound. What
                this film did for me and for many other believers was remind
              us of how much it cost for Jesus to redeem us. — Patrick
              McBurney ’88, Richland, Wash.
 No Need for Other Subscriptions?
 THIS TIME YOU’VE done it all: missions/ spiritual journey/history/the
              Iraq war/art/book and film reviews/cultural issues/travel (just
              returned from Paris where we toted Rick Steves’ Paris 2004)/stewardship/AIDS
              awareness/sports/news. Let’s see: Toss in a recipe or two (no,
              please, just kidding), and I can cancel all my other magazine subscriptions. Well done!
 — Marilyn McGinnis ’61, Glendale, Calif.
 
 
 What Do You Think? Don’t be shy!
 
 We’d like to hear your opinion about Response or any
                articles 
  
       printed in the publication. To tell us what you think, send email to 
  
              response@spu.edu, or visit 
  
       . You may
         also write Editor, Response, 
  
              ºù«ÍÞÊÓÆµ, 3307 Third Avenue West, Suite 116,
         Seattle, Washington
  
       98119–1922. Letters must be signed and will be printed as space 
  
              permits.
 
 
 |