| The Big-Screen Wardrobe Walden Media's Michael Flaherty 
                    Divulges the Challenges of Filming Narnia Will Aslan look like a real lion, or a cartoon? Will the 
                    echoes of the gospel in the book The Lion, the Witch and 
                    the Wardrobe be distorted or downplayed? Will the movie 
                    adaptation be safe for young children? Director Andrew Adamson, who unleashed Shrek and 
                    Shrek 2 on the world, is under enormous pressure 
                    to fulfill not only the expectations of Walt Disney Pictures, 
                    but also the demands of C.S. Lewis fans with the release of 
                    the film The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch 
                    and the Wardrobe. Selected for the job by Disney and 
                    Walden Media, he’s expected to deliver entertainment 
                    on the level of Peter Jackson’s extraordinary adaptations 
                    of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. 
                    Narnia purists will scrutinize his work for accuracy, even 
                    as he strives to introduce newcomers to Aslan’s realm 
                    with the appropriate grandeur and grace. There is no doubt that Disney will ensure awe and amazement 
                    with cutting-edge special effects cooked up by WETA Workshop, 
                    who animated Jackson’s trilogy so impressively. The 
                    Workshop has revealed tantalizing glimpses of its progress 
                    in Internet exclusives. And Walden Media — a production 
                    company focused on positive and family-friendly films, books, 
                    and interactive programs — is striving to ensure that 
                    young students discover the reservoir of meaning in Lewis’ 
                    mythmaking. But the greatest challenge for the filmmakers of The 
                    Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is in bringing C.S. 
                    Lewis’ story to the big screen without compromising 
                    the core of his storytelling genius. In a sense, Adamson’s 
                    task is the opposite of Jackson’s. Tolkien’s tale 
                    was so elaborate, filmmakers had to prune whatever branches 
                    they could. Lewis’ stories are surprisingly simple, 
                    making it necessary for Adamson to embellish a great deal. 
                    Doing so without altering the story’s essence is a formidable 
                    challenge. Micheal Flaherty, president of Walden Media, understands 
                    this. In fact, it is of paramount importance to him to preserve 
                    that integrity. “We always have to be so careful,” 
                    he laughs, “because there are so many people who love 
                    this book, and they get nervous when they think of any enhancement 
                    or addition.” Still, he explains, books and film “are 
                    two different media.” “There are a lot of gaps [to fill] if you want to make 
                    a creative, incredibly exciting film,” says Flaherty, 
                    a Christian and passionate Narnia fan himself. “So, 
                    the key for us was to find this visionary … who had 
                    been figuring out how he wanted to make the film for the last 
                    several decades in his mind.” Does Adamson’s vision comply with the specifics of 
                    Lewis’ narrative? Imagine the daunting task of creating 
                    Narnia’s magisterial lion, Aslan. Upon hearing Aslan’s 
                    name for the first time, Lewis tells us, “Edmund felt 
                    a sensation of mysterious horror. Peter felt suddenly brave 
                    and adventurous.” Upon seeing the lion’s fearsome 
                    power, “they found they couldn’t look at him and 
                    went all trembly.” If Aslan made the children “trembly,” he probably 
                    had a similar effect on those assigned to animate him. Says 
                    Flaherty: “It is tough to get that combination in there. 
                    He’s not safe, but he’s good. 
                    … Andrew Adamson and Mark Johnson, the producer, working 
                    with Douglas Gresham [Lewis’ stepson] … they just 
                    did a fantastic job finding that balance. The lion’s 
                    completely computer-generated, and there’s no way to 
                    tell that it’s not a real lion, other than the fact 
                    that you’ve never seen a lion like this before.” While Flaherty’s excited about the kingly cat, he’s 
                    similarly pleased with other aspects of the film. He points 
                    out the relationships among the children, the “Sons 
                    of Adam and Daughters of Eve,” as a particular success. 
                    (Incidentally, isn’t there something poetic about this 
                    film being directed by someone named “Adamson”?) 
                    And he calls Tilda Swinton’s performance as the White 
                    Witch “outstanding.” Flaherty sounds more like the president of a fan club than 
                    the president of a production company: “Everything from 
                    the professorspeaking to Peter and Susan, right up to the kids spilling 
                    out of the wardrobe at the end of the story … Andrew 
                    and Mark just did such a great job.”
 But the lasting power of Lewis’ story stems from more 
                    than its plot and characters. In his essay “On Stories,” 
                    Lewis describes the essence of storytelling. “To be 
                    stories at all they must be series of events: but it must 
                    be understood that this series — the plot, 
                    as we call it — is only really a net whereby to catch 
                    something else. … And I must confess that the net very 
                    seldom does succeed in catching the bird.” That is to say, if the proper details are in place, they 
                    will suggest meanings that cannot be expressed otherwise, 
                    ideas that cannot be reduced to a sermon, a lesson, or a paraphrase. 
                    Lewis insisted that The Wardrobe was not written 
                    as a tract for Christianity: “Everything began with 
                    images: a faun carrying an umbrella, a queen on a sledge, 
                    a magnificent lion,” he explained. “At first, 
                    there wasn’t even anything Christian about them; that 
                    element pushed itself in of its own accord.” So what of the rumors that filmmakers intentionally weakened 
                    the film’s Christian implications? “Nothing,” 
                    Flaherty insists, “nothing’s happened 
                    to enhance or detract from any element of the story. The film 
                    is the book.” He’s clearly heard rumors of all 
                    kinds, though, and laughs. “The other day [I read] about 
                    someone being upset because there was a scene where you could 
                    hear toilets flushing at the beavers’ house. I have 
                    no idea where that came from.” Christian volunteers, sensing the arrival of a movie that 
                    will open opportunities for evangelism, have mobilized across 
                    the country — just as they did for Mel Gibson’s 
                    The Passion of the Christ — to promote what 
                    they call a “faith-based film.” One such effort 
                    () 
                    nicknamed its volunteers “Narniacs” and promised 
                    them film-related rewards. The filmmakers are not making any 
                    moves to stop this. Indeed, the production of such film-related 
                    propaganda as a soundtrack album populated by Christian pop 
                    stars demonstrates shrewd marketing to a built-in audience. Flaherty believes that the use of Narnia as a teaching tool 
                    is almost inevitable. “I don’t think it’s 
                    any threat to Lewis’ work,” he says. “The 
                    Girls Scouts are using [the movie] to teach about the heroism 
                    of the two girls. Churches are going to use it to teach lessons 
                    that are important to them. History teachers are using it 
                    to teach about the Blitz. Music teachers are using it to teach 
                    about the power of music. … The beauty of any great 
                    story is that people will run with it. They’ll see truth 
                    in it.” As audiences — Christian and otherwise — count 
                    down to opening day, parents may pause, remembering how (appropriately) 
                    dark and violent Jackson’s vision of The Lord of 
                    the Rings proved to be. Should they shield young children 
                    to save them from Narnia nightmares? “If the book’s acceptable for the family, I think 
                    the movie is acceptable for the family,” says Flaherty, 
                    father of three children. Still, it is probably wise for parents 
                    to proceed with caution. Children may not be alarmed to read 
                    about how the Giant in Aslan’s army “crushed dozens 
                    of the foe” with his feet. But to see elaborate 
                    images calculated to thrill audiences with their ferocity 
                    — that can be another matter. Lewis and Tolkien knew, however, that darkness is an artist’s 
                    asset, because it emphasizes the power of light. Evil’s 
                    role is an integral part of their vision, which — while 
                    whimsical, imaginative, and fantastic — reflects reality. 
                    If Lewis is right and the author’s plot is “only 
                    really a net whereby to catch something else,” then 
                    portrayals of evil in storytelling can capture something else, 
                    too: the everlasting promises of God that sustain our hope 
                    during dark times. Flaherty reaches the same conclusion. He feels his mission 
                    at Walden Media is to provide stories that catch visions of 
                    hope in nets of excellent storytelling. Walden Media coordinates 
                    with schools for educational efforts surrounding its films, 
                    from the science of James Cameron’s documentaries, to 
                    the emphasis on volunteerism in Because of Winn Dixie, 
                    to the liberating power of literacy in Holes. “When 
                    you’re in the middle of difficult things,” he 
                    explains, “you can really get overwhelmed and not understand 
                    that you have a path out. For me, it’s [the theme] of 
                    Narnia — it’s the hope in a hopeless world.” — BY Jeffrey OverstreetPhotos copyright 2005 Disney Enterprises, Inc., and Walden Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Back to the topBack to Home
 |