|   |   |   | 
| 
 
	 
 
 
 
 |  
President Eaton's latest Response article [Summer 2001] was another 
reminder to me of the lasting impact he is having on SPU, our community and the 
church at large. I applaud his efforts to engage the culture for the cause of 
Christ. His influence is reaching far beyond the bounds of Queen Anne Hill. 
Since I work with an SPU board member, I know the enthusiasm Dr. Eaton has for 
Christ is infecting people all around the world. As an alumnus, I can't tell
you how excited I am to see our president step out courageously, with dignity 
and respect, to contend for such deeply held and enduring matters of faith.  
While reading the recent edition of Response [Summer 2001], I noted a
small article concerning a significant change in the policies, beliefs and 
practices of SPU. The issue is of course social dancing on campus. 
 I 
believe that the institution is trampling on the heritage for which my mentors 
sacrificially invested their lives on the slopes of Queen Anne Hill. Although I 
no longer live in the immediate geographical vicinity of the Northwest, my sense 
of pride in being a graduate of a distinctively Christian institution has been 
significantly eroded. It seems that instead of upholding a standard of righteousness 
the school is now seeking the lowest common denominator of spirituality and 
Christian living. I was a proud Falcon, but no more!
 
Beverly and I are avid social dancers. We applaud SPU's new policy [on dancing].  
 All kinds of people's lives are somehow intertwined with ours through 
 the common interest of ballroom dancing. No, we never try to preach to anyone. 
 Instead, because of the intertwining of our lives, we are engaged with each other 
 regardless of our backgrounds. There have been many occasions when we waltz to 
 the tune of "Amazing Grace," or when a fellow dancer asks us about our Christian 
 faith, or when we can give a dancer a hug because he/she looks so sad, or we 
 can pray for a specific dancer. What a marvelous way to engage those whose lives 
 touch ours. 
 
The centerpiece on SPU's SPRINT teams [in the Summer 2001 Response] did 
my heart good. 
 I would like to clarify the fact that SPU has had a long 
history of summer student missions, and its resurgence began in 1978 with faculty 
and student initiatives, not in 1983. The older student-led organization was known 
as Operation Outreach, and dated back at least to the late 1960s. I was also
thrilled to see Response finally do a report on the incredible kingdom service 
that Keith Isbell has done for over a decade in HCJB's Shell Hospital in the
jungles of Ecuador. I had the privilege of flying through the Andes in a MAF
plane to visit him there last November. It was one of the highlights of my personal 
ministry to see Keith, my former student, and his wife, Loly, ministering there 
among the poorest of the poor.
 
Thanks for featuring the SPRINT program in the last Response. I must say it brings 
back memories: wondering if we could risk such a program, how it could possibly 
continue to be funded, etc. I remember [then Vice President for Student Life] 
Steve Hayner responding to one strong critic when one of our students stayed on 
in Bangladesh after the India team and was there during one of the horribly 
disastrous floodings. She was a nursing student and so jumped in to help. When 
challenged as to how SPU could risk letting her be there, Steve's answer was
something to the effect that that's exactly where she should be, making a difference 
with her skills at a time of need. It's exciting to see what God is doing in and 
through so many students who are willing to say "Yes!" even into the unknown.  
To voice your opinion about Response or any articles printed within the 
publication, write Editor, Response, ºù«ÍÞÊÓÆµ, 3307
Third Avenue West, Seattle, WA 98119-1997. Or send an e-mail message to 
. 
Letters must be signed and will be printed as space permits.  | |
| 
 
 |